This is a submission for the Permit.io Authorization Challenge: AI Access Control
What I Built
I've created AI Guardian, an intelligent content platform that combines advanced AI capabilities with robust authorization controls. As organizations increasingly rely on AI for sensitive operations, the need for sophisticated governance becomes critical - AI Guardian addresses this emerging challenge head-on.
AI Guardian enables organizations to safely leverage AI while maintaining fine-grained control over:
- What data AI agents can access
- What operations AI agents can perform
- When human approval is required
- How AI-generated content is vetted before release
The platform implements several innovative authorization patterns specifically designed for AI:
- AI Agent Identity Layer: AI agents have their own identity with specific permission boundaries
- Trust-Based Authorization: Permissions adapt based on AI confidence scores and historical performance
- Multi-Stage Approval Workflows: Critical AI operations require graduated human oversight
- Attribute-Based Data Access: AI can only access data appropriate for its clearance level
- Content Safety Boundaries: Authorization includes content safety verification
By leveraging Permit.io's flexible authorization framework, AI Guardian demonstrates how organizations can implement robust governance for AI systems without sacrificing agility.
Demo
Admin credentials:
- username:
admin
- password:
2025DEVChallenge
User credentials:
- username:
newuser
- password:
2025DEVChallenge
The demo showcases:
- Different AI agents with varying permission levels
- The human-in-the-loop approval workflow
- Dynamic permission adjustments based on AI performance
- Comprehensive audit trail of all AI actions and authorization decisions
My Journey
Developing AI Guardian changed my perspective on how authorization should work for AI systems.
The Unique Challenge of AI Authorization
When I started this project, I quickly realized that traditional authorization models are inadequate for AI systems because:
- AI agents act autonomously - they make independent decisions that may require different permission levels
- AI operations have varying confidence levels - the certainty of AI predictions should influence permissions
- AI access needs change dynamically - as AI learns and improves, permission boundaries should adapt
- The actor isn't always human - the "user" in AI systems might be another system or the AI itself
These realizations forced me to rethink authorization from first principles.
My Approach to AI Authorization
After extensive research, I developed a multi-faceted authorization model with several innovative components:
1. Dual Identity Authorization
I implemented a dual-identity model where every AI operation considers both:
- The human user or system that initiated the AI action
- The AI agent performing the action
This allows for granular control that considers both who requested the AI's help and which AI is performing the task.
2. Confidence-Based Permission Boundaries
I developed a system where the AI's permission scope changes based on its confidence level:
- High-confidence operations proceed automatically
- Medium-confidence operations require lightweight verification
- Low-confidence operations require human approval
3. Human-in-the-Loop Authorization Chains
For critical operations, I implemented approval workflows where:
- AI proposes an action with its confidence score
- Human reviewers approve or reject based on context
- Feedback from approvals adjusts future AI permission boundaries
Implementation Challenges
Challenge 1: Modeling AI Agents in Permit.io
The first challenge was representing AI agents within the authorization system. I solved this by extending Permit.io's user model:
# Create an AI agent in the system
ai_agent = {
"key": "gpt4-document-analyzer",
"first_name": "GPT-4",
"last_name": "Document Analyzer",
"email": "ai-agent-doc-analyzer@ai-guardian.internal",
"attributes": {
"agent_type": "language_model",
"model_version": "gpt-4",
"trust_level": 0.85, # Baseline trust level
"clearance_level": 2, # Security clearance
"capabilities": ["document_analysis", "content_generation", "summarization"],
"requires_approval_for": ["pii_handling", "legal_advice"]
}
}
# Register AI agent with Permit.io
permit.api.users.create(ai_agent)
Challenge 2: Implementing Trust-Based Permissions
Another significant challenge was creating a system where AI permissions adapt based on trust levels. I implemented a feedback loop that:
- Monitors AI operation outcomes
- Collects human feedback on AI decisions
- Adjusts trust levels accordingly
- Updates permission boundaries based on new trust levels
# Update AI agent trust level based on operation outcomes
async def update_ai_trust(agent_id, operation_result, human_feedback):
# Get current agent data
agent = await permit.api.users.get(agent_id)
current_trust = agent.attributes.get("trust_level", 0.5)
# Calculate new trust level based on operation and feedback
trust_delta = calculate_trust_delta(operation_result, human_feedback)
new_trust = max(0.1, min(0.99, current_trust + trust_delta))
# Update agent attributes with new trust level
await permit.api.users.update(agent_id, {
"attributes": {
**agent.attributes,
"trust_level": new_trust
}
})
# Log trust level change for audit
await log_trust_change(agent_id, current_trust, new_trust, operation_result, human_feedback)
return new_trust
Challenge 3: Content-Aware Authorization
A particularly difficult challenge was implementing authorization that considers the content being processed. I solved this by integrating content analysis into the authorization flow:
# Pre-authorization hook for content safety
@app.middleware("http")
async def content_authorization_middleware(request, call_next):
if request.url.path.startswith("/api/ai/generate"):
# Extract request data
request_data = await request.json()
prompt = request_data.get("prompt", "")
# Analyze content for safety issues
content_analysis = await analyze_content_safety(prompt)
# Add content analysis to request context for authorization decision
request.state.auth_context = {
"content_safety_score": content_analysis.safety_score,
"detected_topics": content_analysis.topics,
"sensitivity_level": content_analysis.sensitivity
}
response = await call_next(request)
return response
Key Learnings
This project taught me several valuable lessons about AI authorization:
- Context is critical - AI authorization must consider a rich context including content, confidence, and user intent
- Trust is earned - AI systems should earn permission privileges through demonstrated reliability
- Human oversight scales - Well-designed approval workflows can provide oversight without becoming bottlenecks
- Authorization as a feedback system - Permission boundaries should adapt based on operational feedback
Authorization for AI Applications with Permit.io
I implemented several innovative authorization patterns using Permit.io:
AI Agent Management
I created a framework for managing AI agents as authorization entities:
# AI Agent management class
class AIAgentManager:
def __init__(self, permit_client):
self.permit = permit_client
async def register_agent(self, agent_config):
"""Register a new AI agent with authorization system"""
agent_id = f"ai-{agent_config['model']}-{uuid.uuid4().hex[:8]}"
# Create agent in Permit.io
await self.permit.api.users.create({
"key": agent_id,
"email": f"{agent_id}@ai-guardian.internal",
"first_name": agent_config["name"],
"last_name": "AI Agent",
"attributes": {
"agent_type": agent_config["type"],
"model": agent_config["model"],
"version": agent_config["version"],
"capabilities": agent_config["capabilities"],
"trust_level": agent_config.get("initial_trust", 0.7),
"clearance_level": agent_config.get("clearance", 1)
}
})
# Assign appropriate roles
for role in agent_config.get("roles", []):
await self.permit.api.roles.assign(
user=agent_id,
role=role,
tenant="default"
)
return agent_id
Multi-Level Approval Workflows
I built sophisticated approval workflows for AI operations:
# Multi-level approval system
class AIApprovalWorkflow:
def __init__(self, permit_client):
self.permit = permit_client
async def check_operation_approval(self, user_id, ai_agent_id, operation, resource, context):
"""Check if an AI operation requires approval and at what level"""
# Get AI agent details
ai_agent = await self.permit.api.users.get(ai_agent_id)
trust_level = ai_agent.attributes.get("trust_level", 0)
# Get operation risk level
operation_risk = await self.get_operation_risk(operation, resource, context)
# Determine approval level based on trust and risk
if operation_risk > 0.8:
# High-risk operations always need approval
return {"needs_approval": True, "level": "manager", "reason": "High-risk operation"}
elif operation_risk > 0.5 and trust_level < 0.8:
# Medium-risk operations need approval if trust is not high
return {"needs_approval": True, "level": "supervisor", "reason": "Medium-risk operation with moderate trust"}
elif operation in ai_agent.attributes.get("requires_approval_for", []):
# Specifically flagged operations
return {"needs_approval": True, "level": "standard", "reason": "Operation type requires approval"}
else:
# No approval needed
return {"needs_approval": False}
Context-Rich Authorization Checks
I implemented authorization checks with rich context about AI operations:
# AI operation authorization
async def authorize_ai_operation(user_id, ai_agent_id, operation, resource_type, resource_id, data):
# Build rich authorization context
context = {
# Operation context
"operation": operation,
"operation_time": datetime.utcnow().isoformat(),
# Content analysis
"content_type": data.get("content_type"),
"content_classification": await classify_content(data.get("content", "")),
# AI specific context
"ai_confidence": data.get("confidence", 1.0),
"ai_explanation": data.get("explanation", ""),
# Resource context
"resource_metadata": await get_resource_metadata(resource_type, resource_id)
}
# Check if user can initiate this AI operation
user_permitted = await permit.check({
"user": user_id,
"action": f"initiate_{operation}",
"resource": f"{resource_type}:{resource_id}",
"context": context
})
if not user_permitted:
return {"authorized": False, "reason": "User not authorized to initiate operation"}
# Check if AI agent can perform this operation
ai_permitted = await permit.check({
"user": ai_agent_id,
"action": operation,
"resource": f"{resource_type}:{resource_id}",
"context": context
})
if not ai_permitted:
return {"authorized": False, "reason": "AI not authorized to perform operation"}
# Check if approval workflow is needed
approval_check = await check_approval_requirements(user_id, ai_agent_id, operation, resource_type, resource_id, context)
if approval_check["needs_approval"]:
# Create approval request instead of authorizing immediately
await create_approval_request(user_id, ai_agent_id, operation, resource_type, resource_id, context, approval_check["level"])
return {"authorized": False, "pending_approval": True, "approval_id": approval_check["request_id"]}
# Operation is authorized
return {"authorized": True}
Audit and Monitoring
I implemented comprehensive auditing of all AI operations:
# AI operation auditing middleware
@app.middleware("http")
async def ai_audit_middleware(request, call_next):
if request.url.path.startswith("/api/ai/"):
# Start timing
start_time = time.time()
# Get request info
method = request.method
path = request.url.path
user_id = request.user.id if hasattr(request, "user") else "anonymous"
try:
# Get request body for audit context
body = await request.json() if method in ["POST", "PUT", "PATCH"] else {}
# Extract AI agent ID if present
ai_agent_id = body.get("ai_agent_id")
# Extract operation details
operation = extract_operation_from_path(path)
resource_info = extract_resource_from_path(path)
# Pre-operation audit entry
audit_id = await create_audit_entry({
"user_id": user_id,
"ai_agent_id": ai_agent_id,
"operation": operation,
"resource_type": resource_info.get("type"),
"resource_id": resource_info.get("id"),
"timestamp": datetime.utcnow().isoformat(),
"request_data": sanitize_sensitive_data(body),
"status": "initiated"
})
# Add audit ID to request state
request.state.audit_id = audit_id
except Exception as e:
# Log audit preparation error
logger.error(f"Error preparing audit: {str(e)}")
# Process the request
response = await call_next(request)
try:
# Update audit with response
if hasattr(request.state, "audit_id"):
execution_time = time.time() - start_time
response_body = response.body.decode() if hasattr(response, "body") else ""
await update_audit_entry(request.state.audit_id, {
"status": "completed" if response.status_code < 400 else "failed",
"response_code": response.status_code,
"execution_time": execution_time,
"response_summary": summarize_response(response_body)
})
except Exception as e:
# Log audit update error
logger.error(f"Error updating audit: {str(e)}")
return response
# Non-AI endpoints bypass audit
return await call_next(request)
By leveraging Permit.io's flexible authorization model, I created a sophisticated governance system for AI operations that balances innovation with appropriate controls, enabling organizations to leverage AI capabilities responsibly and securely.