Asynchronous JavaScript has come a long way—from callback hell to Promises and now the elegant async/await syntax. But even in modern code, developers often ask:
“Should I use
async/awaitorPromise.all()?”
Let’s settle the debate with clear examples, performance comparisons, and best practices in 2025.
🧠 The Core Difference
-
async/await: Executes asynchronous operations sequentially, unless used withPromise.all. -
Promise.all(): Executes multiple promises in parallel and waits for all of them to resolve (or reject).
⚡ Sequential vs Parallel
Let’s say you need to make 3 API calls.
❌ Sequential Execution (async/await)
const getData = async () => {
const a = await fetchDataA(); // wait
const b = await fetchDataB(); // wait
const c = await fetchDataC(); // wait
return [a, b, c];
};Time taken ≈
fetchDataA+fetchDataB+fetchDataC
✅ Parallel Execution (Promise.all)
const getData = async () => {
const [a, b, c] = await Promise.all([
fetchDataA(),
fetchDataB(),
fetchDataC(),
]);
return [a, b, c];
};Time taken ≈ max(
fetchDataA,fetchDataB,fetchDataC)
🧠 Use Promise.all() when tasks are independent and can run in parallel.
💥 What About Errors?
Promise.all() Fails Fast:
try {
const [a, b] = await Promise.all([failingFunc(), successFunc()]);
} catch (err) {
console.error('At least one failed:', err);
}If any promise rejects, the entire Promise.all() rejects.
Want All Results No Matter What? Use Promise.allSettled():
const results = await Promise.allSettled([
mightFail1(),
mightFail2(),
]);
results.forEach((result) => {
if (result.status === 'fulfilled') console.log(result.value);
else console.error(result.reason);
});🔁 Looping with Async Ops
Here’s where async/await shines: inside loops.
❌ Not Ideal
for (const user of users) {
await sendEmail(user); // sequential, slow
}
✅ Better: Use Promise.all with .map()
await Promise.all(users.map(user => sendEmail(user)));🚀 This sends emails in parallel. Much faster.
🧠 TL;DR — When to Use What?
| Use Case | Use async/await
|
Use Promise.all()
|
|---|---|---|
| Tasks must run sequentially | ✅ | ❌ |
| Tasks are independent | ❌ | ✅ |
| You need all results, even fails | ❌ | ✅ Promise.allSettled()
|
| Error handling per task | ✅ | ❌ |
| Inside a loop | ✅ (small data) | ✅ .map() + Promise.all for large data |
🧪 Bonus: Performance Benchmark
For I/O-bound operations like API calls or DB queries, parallel execution with Promise.all() significantly improves response time. For CPU-bound tasks, consider using Web Workers or moving to a language like Go or Rust.
✨ Final Thoughts
In 2025, writing performant async code is less about picking one method and more about understanding concurrency.
- ✅ Use
async/awaitfor readability. - ✅ Use
Promise.all()for speed. - ✅ Combine both when necessary!