Hey devs 👋
Curious if others have experienced this:
During pair programming or team discussions, we often get into long debates about how to implement something. It starts with, “Should we do it this way or that way?” and suddenly we’re 40 minutes in, still discussing pros and cons.
Sometimes it feels like the loudest opinion wins—not necessarily the best one.
Lately, I’ve been wondering:
What if there was a way to have a neutral voice in the room—one that’s not emotionally invested, knows your codebase, understands business priorities, and can surface trade-offs objectively?
Like... an assistant that:
Knows when tech debt is okay vs. when it’s a red flag
Helps compare approaches in real-time
Keeps the discussion aligned to delivery goals
I’m not sure if this is something other teams run into or if it's just me overthinking things, but I'd love to hear:
Do you run into these kinds of debates?
How do you resolve them?
What do you wish existed to help?
No pitch, no tool—just genuinely curious how other devs think about this.
Appreciate any thoughts 🙏
