For years, I had been using Python as my go-to language for most projects. Its simplicity, vast ecosystem, and rapid development capabilities made it an obvious choice. However, as my latest project grew in complexity and scale, I began hitting performance bottlenecks that Python couldn't overcome. That's when I made the difficult decision to rewrite critical components in C.

The Project: A High-Performance Data Processor

  • My project was a data processing pipeline that needed to:
  • Handle millions of data points per second
  • Perform complex mathematical transformations
  • Maintain low latency for real-time applications
  • Run efficiently on resource-constrained hardware

While Python with NumPy worked fine initially, as our data volumes grew by 10x, we started seeing:

  • Memory usage spikes
  • CPU bottlenecks
  • Unpredictable garbage collection pauses
  • Difficulty integrating with some hardware accelerators

Why C?

After benchmarking and profiling, it became clear that for our core processing logic, we needed:

  • Predictable performance
  • Direct memory control
  • Minimal runtime overhead
  • Better hardware integration

C offered all these benefits, though at the cost of development velocity and safety nets that Python provides.

The Rewrite Process

Phase 1: Identifying Hotspots
I used Python's cProfile to identify the most time-consuming functions. The top candidates for rewriting were:

  • Matrix transformation algorithms
  • Custom statistical calculations
  • Data serialization/deserialization
  • Low-level device communication

Phase 2: Creating C Extensions for Python
Instead of a full rewrite, I first tried creating C extensions using Python's C API:

#include 

static PyObject* fast_transform(PyObject* self, PyObject* args) {
    // Parse Python arguments
    PyObject* input_list;
    if (!PyArg_ParseTuple(args, "O", &input_list)) {
        return NULL;
    }

    // Convert Python list to C array
    Py_ssize_t length = PyList_Size(input_list);
    double* values = malloc(length * sizeof(double));
    for (Py_ssize_t i = 0; i < length; i++) {
        values[i] = PyFloat_AsDouble(PyList_GetItem(input_list, i));
    }

    // Perform computation
    for (Py_ssize_t i = 0; i < length; i++) {
        values[i] = transform_value(values[i]);
    }

    // Convert back to Python list
    PyObject* result = PyList_New(length);
    for (Py_ssize_t i = 0; i < length; i++) {
        PyList_SetItem(result, i, PyFloat_FromDouble(values[i]));
    }

    free(values);
    return result;
}

static PyMethodDef module_methods[] = {
    {"fast_transform", fast_transform, METH_VARARGS, "Perform fast transformation"},
    {NULL, NULL, 0, NULL}
};

PyMODINIT_FUNC PyInit_fastmod(void) {
    return PyModule_Create(&fastmod);
}

This hybrid approach gave us a 5-8x speedup in the critical functions while keeping most of the system in Python.

Phase 3: Full Rewrite of Core Components
For components where even the C extension approach wasn't sufficient, we went for a full rewrite:

Data Processing Engine: Rewrote the core pipeline in C with careful memory management

Network Layer: Implemented a custom protocol handler in C for lower latency

Hardware Integration: Created direct hardware communication bypassing Python entirely

Challenges Faced
1. Memory Management
Going from Python's garbage collection to manual memory management was painful:

// Example of careful memory management
void process_data(DataPacket* packet) {
    Buffer* buf = create_buffer(packet->size);
    if (!buf) {
        handle_error();
        return;
    }

    if (transform_data(packet, buf) != SUCCESS) {
        free_buffer(buf);  // Must clean up on all exit paths
        handle_error();
        return;
    }

    // ... more processing ...

    free_buffer(buf);
}

Solution: Adopted a consistent ownership model and used static analyzers to catch leaks.

2. Error Handling
Python's exceptions vs. C's error codes required careful adaptation:

typedef enum {
    ERR_NONE = 0,
    ERR_INVALID_INPUT,
    ERR_MEMORY,
    ERR_IO,
    // ...
} ErrorCode;

ErrorCode process_file(const char* filename, Result** out_result) {
    *out_result = NULL;

    FILE* fp = fopen(filename, "rb");
    if (!fp) return ERR_IO;

    ErrorCode err = ERR_NONE;
    Result* result = malloc(sizeof(Result));
    if (!result) {
        err = ERR_MEMORY;
        goto cleanup;
    }

    // ... processing ...

    *out_result = result;

cleanup:
    if (err != ERR_NONE && result) free(result);
    if (fp) fclose(fp);
    return err;
}

3. Development Velocity
The edit-compile-test cycle was much slower. We mitigated this by:

Maintaining thorough test suites

Using better tooling (CLion, custom build scripts)

Keeping Python wrappers for rapid prototyping

Image description

Key Lessons Learned

Not All Code Needs Rewriting: Only performance-critical paths benefit from C

Hybrid Approaches Work: Python for glue code, C for heavy lifting

Tooling Matters: Good debuggers (GDB, LLDB) and sanitizers are essential

Testing is Crucial: More bugs surface in C, so need better tests

Document Assumptions: C requires more explicit contracts about memory, threading, etc.

Current Architecture
Our system now looks like:

Python Frontend] <-IPC-> [C Core Engine] <-Direct-> [Hardware]
  • Python handles UI, configuration, and high-level logic
  • C handles all performance-sensitive operations
  • Well-defined interfaces between components

Conclusion

Replacing Python with C was a significant undertaking, but for our performance-critical application, the benefits were undeniable. We achieved:

  • Order-of-magnitude performance improvements
  • More predictable behavior under load
  • Better hardware integration
  • Reduced resource requirements

That said, I wouldn't recommend this approach for every project. The tradeoffs in development speed, safety, and maintainability are substantial. But when you truly need maximum performance and control, C remains an excellent choice even in 2023.

Would I do it again? For the right project - absolutely. But next time, I might consider Rust as a middle ground between Python's safety and C's performance!

Resources That Helped
"Python/C API Reference Manual" - Official documentation

"Effective C" by Robert Seacord - Modern C best practices

"The Art of Writing Shared Libraries" by Ulrich Drepper - For performance tuning

Clang sanitizers - For catching memory issues

Cython - Useful for transitional phases

Have you undertaken a similar migration? I'd love to hear about your experiences in the comments!

Thank you for reading this blog post. If you wanna read such more. Check out my website.