๐Ÿ‘‹ Hey devs!

Weโ€™ve all come across schedulingโ€”whether itโ€™s planning your own tasks or how a CPU schedules different processes. Itโ€™s a pretty common topic in computer science, and when I first learned about it, I had a lot of questions. Mainly: Which scheduling strategy actually works best? ๐Ÿค”

At first, all the different strategiesโ€”SJF, Max-Min, and Mixedโ€”felt a little confusing. So I decided to break things down in a simple way thatโ€™s easy to understand.

In this post, weโ€™ll look at three quick and quirky battle scenarios to see how these strategies work in real life!

๐Ÿ”ฅ The Battle Begins!

We pit Shortest Job First (SJF), Maximum-Minimum (Max-Min), and a Mixed Strategy against each other in a CPU scheduling showdown!

  • SJF โณ: Prioritizes small jobs first, perfect for quickly clearing short tasks โ€” but big jobs might starve.
  • Max-Min ๐Ÿ’ช: Gives priority to big jobs, ensuring heavy processes don't wait โ€” but small jobs can get delayed.
  • Mixed Strategy โš–๏ธ: Aims for balance, preventing both small and large jobs from starving, but adds complexity.

๐Ÿ”— Jump to Battle Scenarios!

1๏ธโƒฃ Scenario 1: SJF โ€“ Small Jobs Rule!

2๏ธโƒฃ Scenario 2: Max-Min โ€“ VIP Jobs First!

3๏ธโƒฃ Scenario 3: Mixed Strategy โ€“ The Best of Both Worlds!


๐Ÿš€ Scenario 1: SJF vs. Max-Min: The Ultimate Restaurant Serve ๐Ÿ”๐Ÿ”ฅ

๐Ÿ‘จโ€๐Ÿณ Welcome to CPU Diner โ€“ Where Scheduling Can Make or Break Your Hunger!

At CPU Diner, three customers arrive simultaneously (AT = 0) and order different meals. Let's see how our two chefs handle their orders!


๐ŸŸ The Customers Arrive

Customer ๐Ÿง Order Type Burst Time (BT) โณ Arrival Time (AT) โฐ
Alex ๐Ÿ˜‹ Fries ๐ŸŸ 2 mins 0
Bob ๐Ÿคค Burger ๐Ÿ” 5 mins 0
Charlie ๐Ÿ˜‘ Pizza ๐Ÿ• 10 mins 0

๐Ÿณ Chef SJFโ€™s Strategy (Shortest Job First)

โฉ SJF Says: "Yo, let's get the fastest orders done first!"

Execution Order in SJF:

1๏ธโƒฃ Fries (2 mins)

2๏ธโƒฃ Burger (5 mins)

3๏ธโƒฃ Pizza (10 mins)

Customer ๐Ÿง Order ๐Ÿฅ˜ BT โณ Start Time โฐ Completion Time (CT) ๐Ÿ Turnaround Time (TAT = CT - AT) โณ Waiting Time (WT = TAT - BT) โณ
Alex ๐Ÿ˜‹ Fries ๐ŸŸ 2 0 2 2 - 0 = 2 2 - 2 = 0
Bob ๐Ÿคค Burger ๐Ÿ” 5 2 7 7 - 0 = 7 7 - 5 = 2
Charlie ๐Ÿ˜‘ Pizza ๐Ÿ• 10 7 17 17 - 0 = 17 17 - 10 = 7

Total Values for SJF:

โœ… Total Finish Time (TFT) = 17 mins

โœ… Total Waiting Time (TWT) = 0 + 2 + 7 = 9 mins

โœ… Total Turnaround Time (TAT) = 2 + 7 + 17 = 26 mins

Execution Order:

1๏ธโƒฃ Fries ๐ŸŸ (2 mins) โ†’ (Done! Alex is happy ๐Ÿ˜)

2๏ธโƒฃ Burger ๐Ÿ” (5 mins) โ†’ (Done! Bob is satisfied ๐Ÿ˜Œ)

3๏ธโƒฃ Pizza ๐Ÿ• (10 mins) โ†’ (Finally! Charlie eats ๐Ÿ˜)


๐Ÿ”ฅ Chef Max-Minโ€™s Strategy (Longest Job First)

๐Ÿข Max-Min Says: "Naaaah, let's tackle the BIGGEST meal first. Letโ€™s make โ€˜em wait! ๐Ÿ˜ˆ"

Execution Order in Max-Min:

1๏ธโƒฃ Pizza (10 mins)

2๏ธโƒฃ Burger (5 mins)

3๏ธโƒฃ Fries (2 mins)

Customer ๐Ÿง Order ๐Ÿฅ˜ BT โณ Start Time โฐ Completion Time (CT) ๐Ÿ Turnaround Time (TAT = CT - AT) โณ Waiting Time (WT = TAT - BT) โณ
Charlie ๐Ÿ˜‘ Pizza ๐Ÿ• 10 0 10 10 - 0 = 10 10 - 10 = 0
Bob ๐Ÿคค Burger ๐Ÿ” 5 10 15 15 - 0 = 15 15 - 5 = 10
Alex ๐Ÿ˜‹ Fries ๐ŸŸ 2 15 17 17 - 0 = 17 17 - 2 = 15

Total Values for Max-Min:

โŒ Total Finish Time (TFT) = 17 mins (same as SJF, but less efficient!)

โŒ Total Waiting Time (TWT) = 0 + 10 + 15 = 25 mins (WAY higher than SJF! ๐Ÿ”ฅ๐Ÿ”ฅ๐Ÿ”ฅ)

โŒ Total Turnaround Time (TAT) = 10 + 15 + 17 = 42 mins (MUCH worse! ๐Ÿ’€)

Execution Order:

1๏ธโƒฃ Pizza ๐Ÿ• (10 mins) โ†’ (Charlie is happy, but Alex & Bob are starving! ๐Ÿ˜ต)

2๏ธโƒฃ Burger ๐Ÿ” (5 mins) โ†’ (Bob FINALLY eatsโ€ฆ but he's annoyed ๐Ÿคฌ)

3๏ธโƒฃ Fries ๐ŸŸ (2 mins) โ†’ (Alex couldโ€™ve eaten long agoโ€ฆ now heโ€™s fuming! ๐Ÿ˜ก๐Ÿ”ฅ)


๐Ÿ“Š SJF vs. Max-Min: The Ultimate Scoreboard

Metric ๐Ÿ“Š SJF ๐Ÿณ (Fastest First) Max-Min ๐Ÿ”ฅ (Slowest First) ๐Ÿ† Winner
Execution Time (TET) Same (Depends on BT) Same (Depends on BT) ๐Ÿค Tie
Waiting Time (TWT) โœ… 9 mins โŒ 25 mins ๐Ÿ† SJF
Turnaround Time (TAT) โœ… 26 mins โŒ 42 mins ๐Ÿ† SJF
Finish Time (TFT) โœ… 17 mins โŒ 17 mins ๐Ÿ† SJF

๐Ÿ”ฅ FINAL VERDICT: SJF WINS! ๐ŸŽ‰

  • SJF serves food quickly & keeps customers happy. ๐ŸŸ๐Ÿ”
  • Max-Min leaves people STARVING! ๐Ÿ˜ก๐Ÿ”ฅ
  • Short jobs should NEVER have to wait behind long jobs!

๐Ÿฅ‡ Who Wins?

โœ… Winner: SJF! ๐ŸŽ‰

  • SJF keeps everyone happy because orders are served in a balanced way.
  • Max-Min is a disaster for small ordersโ€”short tasks suffer!

๐Ÿš€ Lesson: In CPU scheduling (or in real life), serving small tasks first speeds up the whole system!

๐Ÿ’ก Moral of the Story:

"If you want efficiency, always serve short tasks first. Don't make people wait for no reason!" ๐Ÿš€


๐Ÿ Scenario 2: The CPU Olympics โ€“ A High-Priority Race! ๐Ÿƒโ€โ™‚๏ธ๐Ÿ’จ

๐Ÿ’ก Scenario Setup:

Imagine a coding competition where three teams submit programs for execution. The judge (CPU) schedules them based on execution time.

But this time, longer tasks are more important (e.g., AI training, simulations).

โณ The Competitors & Their Programs

Team ๐ŸŽญ Program Name ๐Ÿ’ป Burst Time (BT) โณ Arrival Time (AT) โฐ
Fast Coders โšก Simple Calculator ๐Ÿ–ฉ 2 mins 0
Code Lords ๐Ÿ† Machine Learning Model ๐Ÿค– 8 mins 0
Lazy Devs ๐Ÿ’ค Data Processing ๐Ÿ“Š 4 mins 0

๐Ÿณ Chef SJFโ€™s Strategy (Shortest Job First)

โฉ SJF Says: "Let's finish small programs first, THEN handle the big guys!"

Execution Order in SJF:

1๏ธโƒฃ Simple Calculator (2 mins)

2๏ธโƒฃ Data Processing (4 mins)

3๏ธโƒฃ Machine Learning Model (8 mins)

Team ๐ŸŽญ Program ๐Ÿ’ป BT โณ Start Time โฐ Completion Time (CT) ๐Ÿ Turnaround Time (TAT = CT - AT) โณ Waiting Time (WT = TAT - BT) โณ
Fast Coders โšก Simple Calculator ๐Ÿ–ฉ 2 0 2 2 - 0 = 2 2 - 2 = 0
Lazy Devs ๐Ÿ’ค Data Processing ๐Ÿ“Š 4 2 6 6 - 0 = 6 6 - 4 = 2
Code Lords ๐Ÿ† ML Model ๐Ÿค– 8 6 14 14 - 0 = 14 14 - 8 = 6

Total Values for SJF:

โŒ Total Finish Time (TFT) = 14 mins (Big task delayed! ๐Ÿ˜ฑ)

โŒ Total Waiting Time (TWT) = 0 + 2 + 6 = 8 mins

โŒ Total Turnaround Time (TAT) = 2 + 6 + 14 = 22 mins


๐Ÿ”ฅ Chef Max-Minโ€™s Strategy (Longest Job First)

๐Ÿข Max-Min Says: "Screw the tiny tasks, letโ€™s start with the BIG BOYS! ๐Ÿ’ช"

Execution Order in Max-Min:

1๏ธโƒฃ Machine Learning Model (8 mins)

2๏ธโƒฃ Data Processing (4 mins)

3๏ธโƒฃ Simple Calculator (2 mins)

Team ๐ŸŽญ Program ๐Ÿ’ป BT โณ Start Time โฐ Completion Time (CT) ๐Ÿ Turnaround Time (TAT = CT - AT) โณ Waiting Time (WT = TAT - BT) โณ
Code Lords ๐Ÿ† ML Model ๐Ÿค– 8 0 8 8 - 0 = 8 8 - 8 = 0
Lazy Devs ๐Ÿ’ค Data Processing ๐Ÿ“Š 4 8 12 12 - 0 = 12 12 - 4 = 8
Fast Coders โšก Simple Calculator ๐Ÿ–ฉ 2 12 14 14 - 0 = 14 14 - 2 = 12

Total Values for Max-Min:

โœ… Total Finish Time (TFT) = 14 mins (Same, but ML model finished EARLIER! ๐Ÿš€)

โœ… Total Waiting Time (TWT) = 0 + 8 + 12 = 20 mins (More waiting, but worth it! ๐Ÿ˜)

โœ… Total Turnaround Time (TAT) = 8 + 12 + 14 = 34 mins (Worse for small tasks, but ML finishes FIRST!)


๐Ÿ“Š SJF vs. Max-Min: The Ultimate Scoreboard

Metric ๐Ÿ“Š SJF ๐Ÿณ (Fastest First) Max-Min ๐Ÿ”ฅ (Slowest First) ๐Ÿ† Winner
Execution Time (TET) Same Same ๐Ÿค Tie
Waiting Time (TWT) โœ… 8 mins โŒ 20 mins ๐Ÿ† SJF
Turnaround Time (TAT) โœ… 22 mins โŒ 34 mins ๐Ÿ† SJF
Finish Time (TFT) โœ… 14 mins โœ… 14 mins ๐Ÿค Tie
Priority (Big Tasks Finish Early) โŒ ML Model takes too long! โœ… ML Model Done Faster! ๐Ÿ† Max-Min

๐Ÿ”ฅ FINAL VERDICT: MAX-MIN WINS! ๐ŸŽ‰ (For Priority Tasks)

  • If your goal is to finish BIGGER, more important tasks EARLIER, Max-Min is the KING! ๐Ÿ‘‘
  • If you just want the smallest tasks done fast, go for SJF.

๐Ÿ’ก Moral of the Story:

๐Ÿ”น SJF is better for getting everything done faster. ๐ŸŽ๏ธ

๐Ÿ”น Max-Min is better when HIGH-priority tasks MUST finish first. ๐Ÿ”ฅ


๐Ÿ“Œ Scenario 3: The Grand Hotel CPU ๐Ÿจ

Imagine a hotel with a single elevator that serves VIP guests (big jobs) and regular guests (small jobs).

  • VIP guests (long burst time) pay more ๐Ÿ’ฐ, so they need priority.
  • Regular guests (short burst time) just want to reach their rooms quickly.
  • Some guests arrive later than others (different arrival times).

๐Ÿ”ข Guest List (Processes)

Guest ๐Ÿจ Task ๐Ÿ—๏ธ Burst Time (BT) โณ Arrival Time (AT) โฐ
๐ŸŽ๏ธ Speedy Coder Debugging Small Script 3 mins 0
๐Ÿค– AI Researcher Training Large Model 10 mins 2
๐Ÿ“Š Data Analyst Processing Reports 4 mins 1
๐ŸŽฎ Gamer Running Heavy Graphics 6 mins 3

๐Ÿฅฉ Case 1: SJF โ€“ Small First, Chaos Ensues!

๐Ÿ‘จโ€๐Ÿณ SJF Says: "Short jobs first, always!"

Execution Order:

1๏ธโƒฃ Speedy Coder (3 mins)

2๏ธโƒฃ Data Analyst (4 mins)

3๏ธโƒฃ Gamer (6 mins)

4๏ธโƒฃ AI Researcher (10 mins)

Guest ๐Ÿจ Task ๐Ÿ—๏ธ BT โณ Start Time โฐ Completion Time (CT) ๐Ÿ Turnaround Time (TAT = CT - AT) โณ Waiting Time (WT = TAT - BT) โณ
๐ŸŽ๏ธ Speedy Coder Debugging 3 0 3 3 - 0 = 3 3 - 3 = 0
๐Ÿ“Š Data Analyst Reports 4 3 7 7 - 1 = 6 6 - 4 = 2
๐ŸŽฎ Gamer Graphics 6 7 13 13 - 3 = 10 10 - 6 = 4
๐Ÿค– AI Researcher ML Training 10 13 23 23 - 2 = 21 21 - 10 = 11

Total Values for SJF:

โœ… Total Finish Time (TFT) = 23 mins (Not bad! ๐Ÿ˜Ž)

โœ… Total Waiting Time (TWT) = 0 + 2 + 4 + 11 = 17 mins

โœ… Total Turnaround Time (TAT) = 3 + 6 + 10 + 21 = 40 mins

๐Ÿ˜ฑ BUT WAITโ€ฆ The VIP AI Researcher waited 11 mins before even starting!! BAD for priority jobs. ๐Ÿ˜ฌ


๐Ÿ”ฅ Case 2: Max-Min โ€“ Big First, Everyone Waits!

๐Ÿ’ช Max-Min Says: "BIG jobs get priority, sorry small fries!"

Execution Order:

1๏ธโƒฃ AI Researcher (10 mins)

2๏ธโƒฃ Gamer (6 mins)

3๏ธโƒฃ Data Analyst (4 mins)

4๏ธโƒฃ Speedy Coder (3 mins)

Guest ๐Ÿจ Task ๐Ÿ—๏ธ BT โณ Start Time โฐ Completion Time (CT) ๐Ÿ Turnaround Time (TAT = CT - AT) โณ Waiting Time (WT = TAT - BT) โณ
๐Ÿค– AI Researcher ML Training 10 0 10 10 - 2 = 8 8 - 10 = -2 (???)
๐ŸŽฎ Gamer Graphics 6 10 16 16 - 3 = 13 13 - 6 = 7
๐Ÿ“Š Data Analyst Reports 4 16 20 20 - 1 = 19 19 - 4 = 15
๐ŸŽ๏ธ Speedy Coder Debugging 3 20 23 23 - 0 = 23 23 - 3 = 20

Total Values for Max-Min:

โŒ Total Finish Time (TFT) = 23 mins (Same, but worse TAT!)

โŒ Total Waiting Time (TWT) = -2 + 7 + 15 + 20 = 40 mins (WHAT!? ๐Ÿ˜ญ)

โŒ Total Turnaround Time (TAT) = 8 + 13 + 19 + 23 = 63 mins (Yikes!)

๐Ÿ˜ฌ BAD NEWS: Speedy Coder waited FOREVER. AI Researcher finished early, but short jobs suffered HARD.


๐Ÿ”ฅ๐Ÿ”ฅ Case 3: MIXED STRATEGY โ€“ Balance Both!

๐Ÿง  New Rule:

  • Biggest job shouldnโ€™t starve.
  • Shortest jobs should get quick wins.
  • Medium jobs? Letโ€™s balance!

Execution Order:

1๏ธโƒฃ Speedy Coder (3 mins) โœ… (Quick win!)

2๏ธโƒฃ AI Researcher (10 mins) โœ… (Gets priority!)

3๏ธโƒฃ Data Analyst (4 mins) โœ…

4๏ธโƒฃ Gamer (6 mins) โœ…

Guest ๐Ÿจ Task ๐Ÿ—๏ธ BT โณ Start Time โฐ Completion Time (CT) ๐Ÿ Turnaround Time (TAT = CT - AT) โณ Waiting Time (WT = TAT - BT) โณ
๐ŸŽ๏ธ Speedy Coder Debugging 3 0 3 3 - 0 = 3 3 - 3 = 0
๐Ÿค– AI Researcher ML Training 10 3 13 13 - 2 = 11 11 - 10 = 1
๐Ÿ“Š Data Analyst Reports 4 13 17 17 - 1 = 16 16 - 4 = 12
๐ŸŽฎ Gamer Graphics 6 17 23 23 - 3 = 20 20 - 6 = 14

Total Values for Mixed Strategy:

โœ… Total Finish Time (TFT) = 23 mins (Same! But better balance!)

โœ… Total Waiting Time (TWT) = 0 + 1 + 12 + 14 = 27 mins (WAY better!)

โœ… Total Turnaround Time (TAT) = 3 + 11 + 16 + 20 = 50 mins (Better than Max-Min!)

๐ŸŽ‰ BEST OF BOTH WORLDS!

  • AI Researcher doesnโ€™t wait forever.
  • Speedy Coder gets fast service.
  • Medium jobs donโ€™t get bullied.

๐Ÿ“Š FINAL SHOWDOWN: The Scoreboard

Metric ๐Ÿ“Š SJF ๐Ÿณ Max-Min ๐Ÿ”ฅ Mixed Strategy โš–๏ธ ๐Ÿ† Winner
Execution Time (TET) โœ… Same โœ… Same โœ… Same ๐Ÿค Tie
Waiting Time (TWT) โœ… 17 mins โŒ 40 mins โœ… 27 mins ๐Ÿ† SJF
Turnaround Time (TAT) โœ… 40 mins โŒ 63 mins โœ… 50 mins ๐Ÿ† SJF & Mixed
Big Jobs Finish Early? โŒ No โœ… Yes โœ… Yes ๐Ÿ† Max-Min & Mixed

๐Ÿ† FINAL VERDICT: MIXED STRATEGY WINS!

  • Best balance for ALL tasks.
  • VIP jobs get priority without starving small tasks.
  • Still maintains a good finish time.

Sometimes itโ€™s not just about the smallest or the biggest tasksโ€”itโ€™s about finding the right balance โš–๏ธ. SJF works great for small and quick jobs โšก, Max-Min is ideal when you need to prioritize big, important ones ๐Ÿ’ช, and the Mixed Strategy gives you a flexible, all-round solution that handles both ๐Ÿš€.

This post was just a simple idea to compare these strategies in an easy way โœ๏ธ. I covered three cases since these were part of what I studied for my exam. If you have more scenarios or thoughts, feel free to share them in the comments ๐Ÿ’ฌโ€”I'd be happy to add more!