๐ Hey devs!
Weโve all come across schedulingโwhether itโs planning your own tasks or how a CPU schedules different processes. Itโs a pretty common topic in computer science, and when I first learned about it, I had a lot of questions. Mainly: Which scheduling strategy actually works best? ๐ค
At first, all the different strategiesโSJF, Max-Min, and Mixedโfelt a little confusing. So I decided to break things down in a simple way thatโs easy to understand.
In this post, weโll look at three quick and quirky battle scenarios to see how these strategies work in real life!
๐ฅ The Battle Begins!
We pit Shortest Job First (SJF), Maximum-Minimum (Max-Min), and a Mixed Strategy against each other in a CPU scheduling showdown!
- SJF โณ: Prioritizes small jobs first, perfect for quickly clearing short tasks โ but big jobs might starve.
- Max-Min ๐ช: Gives priority to big jobs, ensuring heavy processes don't wait โ but small jobs can get delayed.
- Mixed Strategy โ๏ธ: Aims for balance, preventing both small and large jobs from starving, but adds complexity.
๐ Jump to Battle Scenarios!
1๏ธโฃ Scenario 1: SJF โ Small Jobs Rule!
2๏ธโฃ Scenario 2: Max-Min โ VIP Jobs First!
3๏ธโฃ Scenario 3: Mixed Strategy โ The Best of Both Worlds!
๐ Scenario 1: SJF vs. Max-Min: The Ultimate Restaurant Serve ๐๐ฅ
๐จโ๐ณ Welcome to CPU Diner โ Where Scheduling Can Make or Break Your Hunger!
At CPU Diner, three customers arrive simultaneously (AT = 0) and order different meals. Let's see how our two chefs handle their orders!
๐ The Customers Arrive
Customer ๐ง | Order Type | Burst Time (BT) โณ | Arrival Time (AT) โฐ |
---|---|---|---|
Alex ๐ | Fries ๐ | 2 mins | 0 |
Bob ๐คค | Burger ๐ | 5 mins | 0 |
Charlie ๐ | Pizza ๐ | 10 mins | 0 |
๐ณ Chef SJFโs Strategy (Shortest Job First)
โฉ SJF Says: "Yo, let's get the fastest orders done first!"
Execution Order in SJF:
1๏ธโฃ Fries (2 mins)
2๏ธโฃ Burger (5 mins)
3๏ธโฃ Pizza (10 mins)
Customer ๐ง | Order ๐ฅ | BT โณ | Start Time โฐ | Completion Time (CT) ๐ | Turnaround Time (TAT = CT - AT) โณ | Waiting Time (WT = TAT - BT) โณ |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Alex ๐ | Fries ๐ | 2 | 0 | 2 | 2 - 0 = 2 | 2 - 2 = 0 |
Bob ๐คค | Burger ๐ | 5 | 2 | 7 | 7 - 0 = 7 | 7 - 5 = 2 |
Charlie ๐ | Pizza ๐ | 10 | 7 | 17 | 17 - 0 = 17 | 17 - 10 = 7 |
Total Values for SJF:
โ
Total Finish Time (TFT) = 17 mins
โ
Total Waiting Time (TWT) = 0 + 2 + 7 = 9 mins
โ
Total Turnaround Time (TAT) = 2 + 7 + 17 = 26 mins
Execution Order:
1๏ธโฃ Fries ๐ (2 mins) โ (Done! Alex is happy ๐)
2๏ธโฃ Burger ๐ (5 mins) โ (Done! Bob is satisfied ๐)
3๏ธโฃ Pizza ๐ (10 mins) โ (Finally! Charlie eats ๐)
๐ฅ Chef Max-Minโs Strategy (Longest Job First)
๐ข Max-Min Says: "Naaaah, let's tackle the BIGGEST meal first. Letโs make โem wait! ๐"
Execution Order in Max-Min:
1๏ธโฃ Pizza (10 mins)
2๏ธโฃ Burger (5 mins)
3๏ธโฃ Fries (2 mins)
Customer ๐ง | Order ๐ฅ | BT โณ | Start Time โฐ | Completion Time (CT) ๐ | Turnaround Time (TAT = CT - AT) โณ | Waiting Time (WT = TAT - BT) โณ |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Charlie ๐ | Pizza ๐ | 10 | 0 | 10 | 10 - 0 = 10 | 10 - 10 = 0 |
Bob ๐คค | Burger ๐ | 5 | 10 | 15 | 15 - 0 = 15 | 15 - 5 = 10 |
Alex ๐ | Fries ๐ | 2 | 15 | 17 | 17 - 0 = 17 | 17 - 2 = 15 |
Total Values for Max-Min:
โ Total Finish Time (TFT) = 17 mins (same as SJF, but less efficient!)
โ Total Waiting Time (TWT) = 0 + 10 + 15 = 25 mins (WAY higher than SJF! ๐ฅ๐ฅ๐ฅ)
โ Total Turnaround Time (TAT) = 10 + 15 + 17 = 42 mins (MUCH worse! ๐)
Execution Order:
1๏ธโฃ Pizza ๐ (10 mins) โ (Charlie is happy, but Alex & Bob are starving! ๐ต)
2๏ธโฃ Burger ๐ (5 mins) โ (Bob FINALLY eatsโฆ but he's annoyed ๐คฌ)
3๏ธโฃ Fries ๐ (2 mins) โ (Alex couldโve eaten long agoโฆ now heโs fuming! ๐ก๐ฅ)
๐ SJF vs. Max-Min: The Ultimate Scoreboard
Metric ๐ | SJF ๐ณ (Fastest First) | Max-Min ๐ฅ (Slowest First) | ๐ Winner |
---|---|---|---|
Execution Time (TET) | Same (Depends on BT) | Same (Depends on BT) | ๐ค Tie |
Waiting Time (TWT) | โ 9 mins | โ 25 mins | ๐ SJF |
Turnaround Time (TAT) | โ 26 mins | โ 42 mins | ๐ SJF |
Finish Time (TFT) | โ 17 mins | โ 17 mins | ๐ SJF |
๐ฅ FINAL VERDICT: SJF WINS! ๐
- SJF serves food quickly & keeps customers happy. ๐๐
- Max-Min leaves people STARVING! ๐ก๐ฅ
- Short jobs should NEVER have to wait behind long jobs!
๐ฅ Who Wins?
โ Winner: SJF! ๐
- SJF keeps everyone happy because orders are served in a balanced way.
- Max-Min is a disaster for small ordersโshort tasks suffer!
๐ Lesson: In CPU scheduling (or in real life), serving small tasks first speeds up the whole system!
๐ก Moral of the Story:
"If you want efficiency, always serve short tasks first. Don't make people wait for no reason!" ๐
๐ Scenario 2: The CPU Olympics โ A High-Priority Race! ๐โโ๏ธ๐จ
๐ก Scenario Setup:
Imagine a coding competition where three teams submit programs for execution. The judge (CPU) schedules them based on execution time.
But this time, longer tasks are more important (e.g., AI training, simulations).
โณ The Competitors & Their Programs
Team ๐ญ | Program Name ๐ป | Burst Time (BT) โณ | Arrival Time (AT) โฐ |
---|---|---|---|
Fast Coders โก | Simple Calculator ๐ฉ | 2 mins | 0 |
Code Lords ๐ | Machine Learning Model ๐ค | 8 mins | 0 |
Lazy Devs ๐ค | Data Processing ๐ | 4 mins | 0 |
๐ณ Chef SJFโs Strategy (Shortest Job First)
โฉ SJF Says: "Let's finish small programs first, THEN handle the big guys!"
Execution Order in SJF:
1๏ธโฃ Simple Calculator (2 mins)
2๏ธโฃ Data Processing (4 mins)
3๏ธโฃ Machine Learning Model (8 mins)
Team ๐ญ | Program ๐ป | BT โณ | Start Time โฐ | Completion Time (CT) ๐ | Turnaround Time (TAT = CT - AT) โณ | Waiting Time (WT = TAT - BT) โณ |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Fast Coders โก | Simple Calculator ๐ฉ | 2 | 0 | 2 | 2 - 0 = 2 | 2 - 2 = 0 |
Lazy Devs ๐ค | Data Processing ๐ | 4 | 2 | 6 | 6 - 0 = 6 | 6 - 4 = 2 |
Code Lords ๐ | ML Model ๐ค | 8 | 6 | 14 | 14 - 0 = 14 | 14 - 8 = 6 |
Total Values for SJF:
โ Total Finish Time (TFT) = 14 mins (Big task delayed! ๐ฑ)
โ Total Waiting Time (TWT) = 0 + 2 + 6 = 8 mins
โ Total Turnaround Time (TAT) = 2 + 6 + 14 = 22 mins
๐ฅ Chef Max-Minโs Strategy (Longest Job First)
๐ข Max-Min Says: "Screw the tiny tasks, letโs start with the BIG BOYS! ๐ช"
Execution Order in Max-Min:
1๏ธโฃ Machine Learning Model (8 mins)
2๏ธโฃ Data Processing (4 mins)
3๏ธโฃ Simple Calculator (2 mins)
Team ๐ญ | Program ๐ป | BT โณ | Start Time โฐ | Completion Time (CT) ๐ | Turnaround Time (TAT = CT - AT) โณ | Waiting Time (WT = TAT - BT) โณ |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Code Lords ๐ | ML Model ๐ค | 8 | 0 | 8 | 8 - 0 = 8 | 8 - 8 = 0 |
Lazy Devs ๐ค | Data Processing ๐ | 4 | 8 | 12 | 12 - 0 = 12 | 12 - 4 = 8 |
Fast Coders โก | Simple Calculator ๐ฉ | 2 | 12 | 14 | 14 - 0 = 14 | 14 - 2 = 12 |
Total Values for Max-Min:
โ
Total Finish Time (TFT) = 14 mins (Same, but ML model finished EARLIER! ๐)
โ
Total Waiting Time (TWT) = 0 + 8 + 12 = 20 mins (More waiting, but worth it! ๐)
โ
Total Turnaround Time (TAT) = 8 + 12 + 14 = 34 mins (Worse for small tasks, but ML finishes FIRST!)
๐ SJF vs. Max-Min: The Ultimate Scoreboard
Metric ๐ | SJF ๐ณ (Fastest First) | Max-Min ๐ฅ (Slowest First) | ๐ Winner |
---|---|---|---|
Execution Time (TET) | Same | Same | ๐ค Tie |
Waiting Time (TWT) | โ 8 mins | โ 20 mins | ๐ SJF |
Turnaround Time (TAT) | โ 22 mins | โ 34 mins | ๐ SJF |
Finish Time (TFT) | โ 14 mins | โ 14 mins | ๐ค Tie |
Priority (Big Tasks Finish Early) | โ ML Model takes too long! | โ ML Model Done Faster! | ๐ Max-Min |
๐ฅ FINAL VERDICT: MAX-MIN WINS! ๐ (For Priority Tasks)
- If your goal is to finish BIGGER, more important tasks EARLIER, Max-Min is the KING! ๐
- If you just want the smallest tasks done fast, go for SJF.
๐ก Moral of the Story:
๐น SJF is better for getting everything done faster. ๐๏ธ
๐น Max-Min is better when HIGH-priority tasks MUST finish first. ๐ฅ
๐ Scenario 3: The Grand Hotel CPU ๐จ
Imagine a hotel with a single elevator that serves VIP guests (big jobs) and regular guests (small jobs).
- VIP guests (long burst time) pay more ๐ฐ, so they need priority.
- Regular guests (short burst time) just want to reach their rooms quickly.
- Some guests arrive later than others (different arrival times).
๐ข Guest List (Processes)
Guest ๐จ | Task ๐๏ธ | Burst Time (BT) โณ | Arrival Time (AT) โฐ |
---|---|---|---|
๐๏ธ Speedy Coder | Debugging Small Script | 3 mins | 0 |
๐ค AI Researcher | Training Large Model | 10 mins | 2 |
๐ Data Analyst | Processing Reports | 4 mins | 1 |
๐ฎ Gamer | Running Heavy Graphics | 6 mins | 3 |
๐ฅฉ Case 1: SJF โ Small First, Chaos Ensues!
๐จโ๐ณ SJF Says: "Short jobs first, always!"
Execution Order:
1๏ธโฃ Speedy Coder (3 mins)
2๏ธโฃ Data Analyst (4 mins)
3๏ธโฃ Gamer (6 mins)
4๏ธโฃ AI Researcher (10 mins)
Guest ๐จ | Task ๐๏ธ | BT โณ | Start Time โฐ | Completion Time (CT) ๐ | Turnaround Time (TAT = CT - AT) โณ | Waiting Time (WT = TAT - BT) โณ |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
๐๏ธ Speedy Coder | Debugging | 3 | 0 | 3 | 3 - 0 = 3 | 3 - 3 = 0 |
๐ Data Analyst | Reports | 4 | 3 | 7 | 7 - 1 = 6 | 6 - 4 = 2 |
๐ฎ Gamer | Graphics | 6 | 7 | 13 | 13 - 3 = 10 | 10 - 6 = 4 |
๐ค AI Researcher | ML Training | 10 | 13 | 23 | 23 - 2 = 21 | 21 - 10 = 11 |
Total Values for SJF:
โ
Total Finish Time (TFT) = 23 mins (Not bad! ๐)
โ
Total Waiting Time (TWT) = 0 + 2 + 4 + 11 = 17 mins
โ
Total Turnaround Time (TAT) = 3 + 6 + 10 + 21 = 40 mins
๐ฑ BUT WAITโฆ The VIP AI Researcher waited 11 mins before even starting!! BAD for priority jobs. ๐ฌ
๐ฅ Case 2: Max-Min โ Big First, Everyone Waits!
๐ช Max-Min Says: "BIG jobs get priority, sorry small fries!"
Execution Order:
1๏ธโฃ AI Researcher (10 mins)
2๏ธโฃ Gamer (6 mins)
3๏ธโฃ Data Analyst (4 mins)
4๏ธโฃ Speedy Coder (3 mins)
Guest ๐จ | Task ๐๏ธ | BT โณ | Start Time โฐ | Completion Time (CT) ๐ | Turnaround Time (TAT = CT - AT) โณ | Waiting Time (WT = TAT - BT) โณ |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
๐ค AI Researcher | ML Training | 10 | 0 | 10 | 10 - 2 = 8 | 8 - 10 = -2 (???) |
๐ฎ Gamer | Graphics | 6 | 10 | 16 | 16 - 3 = 13 | 13 - 6 = 7 |
๐ Data Analyst | Reports | 4 | 16 | 20 | 20 - 1 = 19 | 19 - 4 = 15 |
๐๏ธ Speedy Coder | Debugging | 3 | 20 | 23 | 23 - 0 = 23 | 23 - 3 = 20 |
Total Values for Max-Min:
โ Total Finish Time (TFT) = 23 mins (Same, but worse TAT!)
โ Total Waiting Time (TWT) = -2 + 7 + 15 + 20 = 40 mins (WHAT!? ๐ญ)
โ Total Turnaround Time (TAT) = 8 + 13 + 19 + 23 = 63 mins (Yikes!)
๐ฌ BAD NEWS: Speedy Coder waited FOREVER. AI Researcher finished early, but short jobs suffered HARD.
๐ฅ๐ฅ Case 3: MIXED STRATEGY โ Balance Both!
๐ง New Rule:
- Biggest job shouldnโt starve.
- Shortest jobs should get quick wins.
- Medium jobs? Letโs balance!
Execution Order:
1๏ธโฃ Speedy Coder (3 mins) โ
(Quick win!)
2๏ธโฃ AI Researcher (10 mins) โ
(Gets priority!)
3๏ธโฃ Data Analyst (4 mins) โ
4๏ธโฃ Gamer (6 mins) โ
Guest ๐จ | Task ๐๏ธ | BT โณ | Start Time โฐ | Completion Time (CT) ๐ | Turnaround Time (TAT = CT - AT) โณ | Waiting Time (WT = TAT - BT) โณ |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
๐๏ธ Speedy Coder | Debugging | 3 | 0 | 3 | 3 - 0 = 3 | 3 - 3 = 0 |
๐ค AI Researcher | ML Training | 10 | 3 | 13 | 13 - 2 = 11 | 11 - 10 = 1 |
๐ Data Analyst | Reports | 4 | 13 | 17 | 17 - 1 = 16 | 16 - 4 = 12 |
๐ฎ Gamer | Graphics | 6 | 17 | 23 | 23 - 3 = 20 | 20 - 6 = 14 |
Total Values for Mixed Strategy:
โ
Total Finish Time (TFT) = 23 mins (Same! But better balance!)
โ
Total Waiting Time (TWT) = 0 + 1 + 12 + 14 = 27 mins (WAY better!)
โ
Total Turnaround Time (TAT) = 3 + 11 + 16 + 20 = 50 mins (Better than Max-Min!)
๐ BEST OF BOTH WORLDS!
- AI Researcher doesnโt wait forever.
- Speedy Coder gets fast service.
- Medium jobs donโt get bullied.
๐ FINAL SHOWDOWN: The Scoreboard
Metric ๐ | SJF ๐ณ | Max-Min ๐ฅ | Mixed Strategy โ๏ธ | ๐ Winner |
---|---|---|---|---|
Execution Time (TET) | โ Same | โ Same | โ Same | ๐ค Tie |
Waiting Time (TWT) | โ 17 mins | โ 40 mins | โ 27 mins | ๐ SJF |
Turnaround Time (TAT) | โ 40 mins | โ 63 mins | โ 50 mins | ๐ SJF & Mixed |
Big Jobs Finish Early? | โ No | โ Yes | โ Yes | ๐ Max-Min & Mixed |
๐ FINAL VERDICT: MIXED STRATEGY WINS!
- Best balance for ALL tasks.
- VIP jobs get priority without starving small tasks.
- Still maintains a good finish time.
Sometimes itโs not just about the smallest or the biggest tasksโitโs about finding the right balance โ๏ธ. SJF works great for small and quick jobs โก, Max-Min is ideal when you need to prioritize big, important ones ๐ช, and the Mixed Strategy gives you a flexible, all-round solution that handles both ๐.
This post was just a simple idea to compare these strategies in an easy way โ๏ธ. I covered three cases since these were part of what I studied for my exam. If you have more scenarios or thoughts, feel free to share them in the comments ๐ฌโI'd be happy to add more!