“If you can’t explain it simply, you don’t understand it well enough.” — Albert Einstein

When systems break, people usually point to a bug in the code. But more often than not? The real bug was upstream — in how the idea was communicated.

As engineers, we spend years mastering code but very little time mastering the craft of explaining our ideas. That gap can make the difference between launching with clarity or drowning in confusion.

The truth is: clear writing is clear thinking. And nowhere is this more visible than in a design doc.

If you want to drive real impact as a software engineer — especially at senior levels — writing great design docs isn’t just a nice-to-have. It’s a superpower!

Because whether you’re building a new service, proposing architectural changes, or aligning across teams, your design doc becomes the source of truth, the collaboration artifact, and the technical memory of your system.

🙅‍♂️ Don’t Write Design Docs Just for the Sake of It

This is one of the biggest traps.

A design doc isn’t a status symbol. It’s a thinking tool. A collaboration vehicle. And sometimes, it’s the right one.

Write a design doc when:

  • You’re making architectural decisions with trade-offs.
  • You need to bring alignment across functions or teams.
  • You’re capturing context for future contributors.

If you’re just updating configs, don’t hold back shipping waiting for a 5-pager.

And when you do write a doc, anchor it around these three questions:

  1. Why are we doing this? What’s the motivation?
  2. What are we building or changing?
  3. So what? Why should your leadership or anyone care?

If you can’t answer these, you’re not ready to write — or you’re solving the wrong problem.

⚙️ Don’t Over-Bake the First Version

Your first draft isn’t your north star. It’s your rough cut — your MVP.

Share early. Let feedback shape the details. It’s like code:
If you hold on too long, you get attached. And when feedback inevitably comes, you resist it.

Start lean. Let it evolve. And time-box the writing process ⏱️.

Design docs, like engineering itself, hit a point of diminishing returns. Chasing the “perfect solution” is tempting, but it can delay execution.

Clarity > cleverness.

🧠 A Personal Lesson — When My Doc Missed the Mark

Early in my career, I once spent days crafting a long, polished design doc. I covered every corner case, drew all the diagrams, and hit 14 pages before I hit “Send.” 📩

Then, in the very first review:
“Wait, that upstream system was deprecated last quarter.”

Turns out, I had built a house on a demolished foundation.

What did I learn?

  • Don’t write in isolation. Don’t gold-plate.
  • Validate early, write lean, and evolve collaboratively.

🔄 The Lifecycle of a Design Doc (Done Right)

Here’s a flow that’s helped me:

  1. Identify the why – Align, clarify, or document design.
  2. Sketch headlines – Start with bullets and big questions.
  3. Get early feedback – Share with tech leads or partners.
  4. Iterate collaboratively – Comments are a gift, not a threat.
  5. Drive review meeting – Focus on open questions, not reading the doc line by line.
  6. Launch, learn, and update – Docs age fast. Keep them alive. (at least minimally)

🦴 Anatomy of a Good Design Doc

Follow this simple structure to keep things crisp and clear:

  • Objective: What is this doc solving?
  • **Goals/Non-Goals: What’s in scope? What’s out?
  • Background: Context, history, links to prior docs.
  • Requirements & Constraints: Functional and non-functional.
  • Overview: High-level component breakdown with a diagram.
  • Detailed Design: Trade-offs, component flows, API surface (lightweight).
  • Design Decisions: Questions, options, pros/cons, chosen path.
  • Appendix: Non-critical details, alt ideas, migration notes.

✅ Bullet points > paragraphs

✅ Diagrams > walls of text

✅ Clarity > cleverness

One important note: Don’t go too deep into implementation details.

You’re not writing a README or code walkthrough. Avoid dumping full APIs or code blocks unless absolutely necessary.

😬 How Not to Write One (Mistakes I’ve Made Too)

Side-by-side illustration comparing a badly written, scribbled design doc with a clean, well-structured design doc

  • Writing for everyone (from VP to intern) → outcome: rambling.
  • Worrying it was “too short” → so I padded it. Waste of time.
  • Dumping code snippets → design ≠ implementation.
  • Paragraph soup 🍜 → just bullet it.
  • Ignoring feedback → reviewers are helping you succeed.
  • Getting defensive → good docs welcome being challenged.
  • Not editing → writing is rewriting.
  • No practice → like code, writing improves with reps.

✨ Final Thoughts

A design doc isn’t just a document. It’s a decision amplifier.

It sharpens your thinking, aligns your team, and creates technical clarity that lasts long after the code is shipped.

But here’s the thing:

  • You don’t need a 10-page masterpiece.
  • You need just enough structure to spark the right conversations, surface trade-offs, and guide execution.

Use design docs intentionally.

👉 Write when there’s complexity to untangle.
🚫 Skip when it’s just a config change.
🎯 Focus on clarity, not perfection.

Because good engineers write code. Great engineers write things that outlive the code.

🔗 More Like This?

If you found this helpful:

  • 📰 Subscribe to my LinkedIn Newsletter
  • 🤝 Follow me on LinkedIn for more deep dives on systems, engineering craft, and lessons from the field.

#DesignDocs #SoftwareEngineering #TechWriting #SystemDesign #DeveloperExcellence #Career #Layoffs #TechnicalLeadership #EngineeringCulture #BackendEngineering #ProductEngineering #MLOps #ScalingSystems #EngineeringWisdom #DistributedBytes #WDAYLife #AWS #Microsoft #Google #BigTech